Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (230735)	5/10/2007 7:24:12 PM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Difficult to disprove? Who's kidding who here? Religions that utilize the Bible do not contain "a set of beliefs at variance with a large body of modern knowledge?" Again, who's kidding who? Sorry, I would not give Holocaust deniers the time of day. Also, that is off-topic. We were discussing Mormonism. Our adventures in the ME would not have happened but for the support of certain Christian views. That is a refreshing change of pace from the usual reason advanced these days: Jews disguised as neo-conservatives. Personally, I think you need to reach deeper than that, probably to Greek or Roman mythology, but that really is another argument entirely, and a rather boring one at that, I think. Look, I'm not interested in defending Mormon theology, I certainly do not subscribe to it, but I don't think it is any more difficult to remain a practicing Mormon in the modern world than it is to remain a practicing Roman Catholic. What you do or don't believe is your business. Who you will or won't vote for because of what they believe is your business. Me? I won't be voting for Mitt Romney any time soon, but it has nothing to do with whether or not he is a Mormon. YMMV - in fact, I am positive it does.