SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Kern who wrote (81690)5/11/2007 8:37:09 AM
From: Paul Kern  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
DATA SNAP: US Apr Retail Sales Below Expectations
Last update: 5/11/2007 8:30:01 AM

=====================================================
US Retail Sales Apr Mar ! Consensus: !
Overall: -0.2% +1.0%r ! +0.4% !
Ex-Autos: Unch% +1.1%r ! Actual: !
! -0.2% !
=====================================================


By Jeff Bater
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. retail sales unexpectedly fell in April, signaling weakness in the economy at the start of the second quarter.

Retail sales decreased 0.2% last month, after rising an upwardly revised 1.0% in March, the Commerce Department said Friday. Originally, March sales were seen 0.7% higher.

The 0.2% decline in overall retail sales during April was a surprise on Wall Street. A Dow Jones Newswires survey of 24 economists had forecast a 0.4% increase.

The retail sales report illustrates where Americans are spending their money. Consumer spending is a big part of the economy. It makes up about 70% of gross domestic product, which is the scoreboard for the economy. Friday's surprising sales data came out a day after retail giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) had said its total U.S. same-store sales fell 3.5% in April.

The Commerce report showed automobile and parts sales fell 1.0% in April. March sales increased 0.4%.

Sales of all retailers except auto and parts dealers were flat in April. Economists expected a 0.4% increase. Demand fell at retail outlets selling clothes and building materials, while it rose at furniture stores. Ex-auto sales in March had gone up 1.1%.

April gasoline station sales increased 1.7% last month. Gas sales surged 3.2% in March. Stripping away sales at gas stations, demand at all other retailers fell 0.4% in April.
And excluding both the auto and gasoline sectors, all other retail sales decreased 0.2% in April.

Sales last month fell 2.3% at building materials and garden stores; 0.1% at eating and drinking places; 0.8% at sporting goods, hobby and book stores; 1.2% at general merchandise stores; and 2.0% at clothing stores.

The drop in building materials sales was the sharpest since 5.1% in February 2003.

Demand rose 1.2% at furniture retailers; 0.9% at health and personal care stores; 0.5% at food and beverage stores; 0.7% at electronic stores; and 1.8% at mail order and Internet retailers.

-By Jeff Bater, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9249; jeff.bater@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 11, 2007 08:30 ET (12:30 GMT)



To: Paul Kern who wrote (81690)5/11/2007 9:02:33 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
difficult to make a case for leaving them out of core when their price rises are now an established long-term trend. in any case, they should be using a long-term moving average of the price change for those two categories rather than leaving them out entirely if all they really wanted was to reduce volatility.



To: Paul Kern who wrote (81690)5/11/2007 11:29:22 AM
From: John Vosilla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
'So, if you don't eat, don't drive, don't heat, and don't cool, there is no inflation.'

Need to find a cheap place like Deflationary Danville that has a mild climate with no need for heating or cooling that also has cheap all you can eat buffet's and you'll be all set<g>



To: Paul Kern who wrote (81690)5/11/2007 12:19:42 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor  Respond to of 110194
 
Core is an especially ridiculous concept with respect to the PPI...if business have to pay more (for energy), does it mean their "core EPS" won't reflect it? Truly insane, in the real world you'd go outta bankrupt if you ran yer business that way.