Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 8bits who wrote (18188)	5/11/2007 7:41:47 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220189

Using your same source : Here's a arbitrary short list of cities with high property values - New York, New York only 16 under 300 K Who knows what part of New York City these are in ? Seattle, Washington only 4 under 125 K 11 under 150 K 29 under 175 K Boston, Taxachhuttes only 14 under 150 K Miami has a bunch of cheap places since the condo boom went bust. San Francisco, California 4 under 250 K 25 under 300 K 83 under 400 K I'm a little surprised Balitmore was so bad, I thought the place had become livable - I guess not. Maybe they need a Rudi Guiliani type. It is very difficult to have a city that is good enough to attract people from the suburbs. So I would not make a bet on a modest urban condo exceeding the price of a standard 3/2 suburban house except in very select places.