Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (337338)	5/11/2007 9:08:09 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575154

re: And if oil went down to where it was before it went up the 350 percent it wouldn't be dirt cheap. It wouldn't be at some level that would require massive government intervention. $20 a barrel? That's cheap my friend, and would knock alternatives out of the water... as it has in the past. "Massive" is your (strawman) word, not mine. re: If alternatives are going to be a good mass replacement (rather than just a supplement on the side) they are going to have to be cheap enough to maintain a lot of their market share even when oil is relatively cheap. Do you support poisoned animal feed from China because it's cheaper? You are so caught up in your ideology that you can't see what is good for your country. You still support the war? I hear the Iraqis are voting on a timetable to throw us out, then they go on vacation, while 100 US soldier die per month. Have a great weekend.