SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (4657)5/15/2007 8:26:55 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25737
 
While I agree often with Prolife I cant understand his position on rudy. Rudy has announced he PERSONALLY is against Abortion, just as Prolife is and frankly as I am. However, the law is the law. Women are humans same as us men. Seems they should have rights. What does he expect Rudy to do? Rudy says he would appoint strict Constitutionalist judges without a litmus test. What else can Rudy do?? The President cannot overturn the law, only the Supreme Court can. Would Prolife rather see a Hillary elected that can be COUNTED ON to appoint LIBERAL judges that would INSURE Abortion would continue plus MANY other very negative things taking our individual rights away from us in favor of Government run life. What I would like as a minimum is to get the government OUT OF ABORTION entirely. Allow it to be legal if we must but not financed by the GOVERNMENT. I also wish men had a say in abortion since last I knew they were 50% responsible for the baby. jdn