SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (4705)5/16/2007 2:56:05 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 25737
 
"But he has Presidential hair."

LOL!

(I think he has 'male model's hair', or 'men's suit manikin hair', and that Presidents are often bald, short and pudgy judging from our history... but that's just me. :-)

"I would have liked to hear Ron Paul given a chance to simply answer the terrorist question you mention, without having to take into accoutn new variables, etc. Paul's point on 9/11 should not be lost in the tub-thumping of patriotic outrage....It would be consistent with his political views that were we not proactively involved in the region, we would not be as desirable a target....and the targeting action would not be of the nature it was."

Seems others are of a like mind, in thinking that corporate FOX has it in for him (both during the debate, and afterwards, in the 'SPIN-views'):

abcnews.go.com

blog.myspace.com



To: pompsander who wrote (4705)5/16/2007 3:23:59 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
It is extremely naive to believe patrolling the no fly zone in Iraq caused 9/11. Hell, there was no love lost between Iraq and Al Qaeda back then.

Paul joined the blame America first crowd with that comment.