Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patchie who wrote (99479)	5/16/2007 3:42:13 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

PATCHIE, JUDD BAGLEY ACCUSED CRAMER OF COMMITING FRAUD BECAUSE OF INSIDER TRADING. HE SHOULD CHECK HIS FACTS AS I DID. By: De Daumier-Smith Send PM Profile Ignore Recommend Add To Favorites Posted as a reply to msg 7237 by FlyonWall Re: Smith, Re: Anybody want to talk about SEC subpoena response ethics? Hey FloydonWall, It helps if you read the actual post. The 10b5-1 plan, apparently hastily written and signed in the hours after Cramer and TSCM got their subpoena, calls for Cramer to sell 12,500 shares per month for a year...150,000 total. If he were operating by the plan, he would have sold 12,500 in 2/06. Instead, Cramer sold 112,500 shares in 2/06, and only then did Cramer tell his shareholders about the subpoena. After 12 months he had sold multiple hundreds of thousands of shares, and in what you can hardly call an "orderly" manner. This was a fraud committed upon the shareholders of TSCM.