SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (337942)5/19/2007 3:31:16 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577146
 
re: Fortunately, no American leader ever was brash enough to do what the hawks wanted them to do.......until now.

You had Vietnam. Then it was the "struggle against global communism"; now it's the "struggle against global terrorism". Both times you couldn't end the war because of the "domino theory"... lose Iraq/Vietnam and the whole world will fall. Iraq/Vietnam will become an infectious disease.


But if you read about Vietnam, it started out as a policing action under the auspices of SEATO. It was only after Johnson 'created' an excuse did it become a full fledge war. The invasion of Iraq was an unprovoked, unsanctioned attack upon a foreign country. It seems to me there is a significant difference between the two not that I think Vietnam was a high point in American history.



To: Road Walker who wrote (337942)5/20/2007 9:14:08 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577146
 
>It's really depressing to see the whole thing play out again. You would think that people my age, who have been through this before, would have stopped it.

Well, I'm in the middle of a book right now where the author talks a lot about the Spanish-American War and compares it to Vietnam (it was written in 1999), and the comparisons are so similar to Iraq-Vietnam.

We never learn. Or maybe we just don't care.

-Z