SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/20/2007 6:22:00 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 173976
 
That would be Carter, followed by Clinton



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 12:58:10 AM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Yes if Peewee Herman were president i'm sure we would be better off...



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:37 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:37 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:37 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:37 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:37 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:38 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:38 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:38 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!



To: American Spirit who wrote (98558)5/21/2007 3:31:41 PM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 173976
 
>>>Bush is the stupidest commander in chief in history. We would have been better off with almost anyone in charge, even Peewee Herman.<<<

You're still making a presumption that Bush is in charge--lol!