SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (12732)5/20/2007 7:17:38 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
I think the current estimates are 5% excess of the total carbon cycle. See my previous reply about steering. We have added a 5% upward bias to the carbon cycle. That is the problem. If you could point out any reasonable reason why some magical 5% carbon spigot was turned on and off independent of natural causes during your historical data, then you would have reason to suspect that the historical data could provide guidance wrt to the present situation. I know of no claims that such happened.



To: longnshort who wrote (12732)5/20/2007 8:29:34 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
If you have a balanced teeter-totter, and you change the weight on one side by 3 %, it throws the system out of balance.