Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (12741)	5/20/2007 8:02:39 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Why not try the put up or shut up modeling challenge: Find any model which, when run over the period of 1988-2007 matches the observed data as well as Hansen's model did, given the same input data, yet somehow shows that continued warming going forward WILL NOT HAPPEN, given the same inputs. I.e. this magical anti-warming model will match Hansen's for the last three decades but will for some unknown reason diverge radically going forward. If any such model can be created, and the model survives peer review, anti-global warming will have arrived as a credible science. Until then, it has not. What could be so difficult? You guys claim that gobs of scientist think Hansen is out to lunch. OK, here is your change. Produce something. Damn, it should be simple. Why the heck can't you guys produce? Constipated or something? Just one reasonable model that backs your nonsense claims.