SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (338201)5/21/2007 9:32:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575187
 
No, in that case it was because Wal-mart had thousands of employees who were living off of taxpayers for health care.

And no others were? How many govt employees in Maryland? All govt employees live off of taxpayers.



To: SilentZ who wrote (338201)5/21/2007 10:15:52 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1575187
 
If Wal-mart's employees are living off of government provided health care, that because the government decided to provide it to them. Now you get a turn around where this provision is justification for further actions by the government, where it has to force wall mart to pay for health care. Its "The Nanny Two-Step"

juliansanchez.com

Message 23512250


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News