SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (338224)5/21/2007 6:27:20 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571881
 
That’s why I blame the food safety crisis on Milton Friedman, who called for the abolition of both the food and the drug sides of the F.D.A. What would protect the public from dangerous or ineffective drugs? “It’s in the self-interest of pharmaceutical companies not to have these bad things,” he insisted in a 1999 interview. He would presumably have applied the same logic to food safety (as he did to airline safety): regardless of circumstances, you can always trust the private sector to police itself.

O.K., I’m not saying that Mr. Friedman directly caused tainted spinach and poisonous peanut butter. But he did help to make our food less safe, by legitimizing what the historian Rick Perlstein calls “E. coli conservatives”: ideologues who won’t accept even the most compelling case for government regulation.


Whoa! Tim and Milton Friedman sound so similar its uncanny. Do you think Tim Fowler is Milton Friedman's online tag?



To: Road Walker who wrote (338224)5/31/2007 2:55:31 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571881
 
“It’s in the self-interest of pharmaceutical companies not to have these bad things”, is true, and its also true about food companies.

But that doesn't equate to "you can always trust the private sector to police itself". You can't, just as you can't always trust the government or any other organization to police drugs, food, etc.