Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 4C who wrote (40564)	5/21/2007 11:38:30 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

Good posts SF, metacomet and Max.

To: 4C who wrote (40564)	5/21/2007 12:48:45 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

Opinions sound quite knowledgeable and fairly drawn, well stated. It is complicated. Dulles did us no favours here. Adventurism and assumption of a mandate to change was not based on any seeming fairness. People's heads rolled to provide easy access to oil. Letting the states do what they would could have been equally dangerous. Pelahvi was a crock, sans doot. But the question remains, can anyone rule there democratically or otherwise without the use of unreasonable force, pogroms and suppression of rebellious elements by extreme means? It is apparent that radical Muslim forces do not believe so. Are we the good guys? Should we be? Let us at least engineer not to be the dead guys, and perhaps not the ruled over. I would like to give everyone a fair chance, provided I am dead sure they will afford myself the same opportunity. EC<:-}