SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (12827)5/21/2007 3:58:50 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
No one can question your god can they.



To: neolib who wrote (12827)5/21/2007 4:00:33 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
I understand why it is a stupid expectation. At this time there is no know way to fill in data that can create what happened in the past. All the data is guesses upon guesses. But we do know that the increase of 1 degree over the last century where 50% of the increase is before any real increase in CO2 and 50% is after the increase currently attributed as the man made CO2 increases

# Less confidence can be placed in large-scale surface temperature reconstructions for the period from A.D. 900 to 1600. Presently available proxy evidence indicates that temperatures at many, but not all, individual locations were higher during the past 25 years than during any period of comparable length since A.D. 900. The uncertainties associated with reconstructing hemispheric mean or global mean temperatures from these data increase substantially backward in time through this period and are not yet fully quantified. Strictly speaking one can thus double or tenfold existing error bars as we go back in time.

So you are clueless about science, math, statistics and engineering, it is good you post with an anonymous handle.



To: neolib who wrote (12827)5/21/2007 6:07:15 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
Message 23386580