Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (12831)	5/21/2007 4:22:57 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

you don't even know the solar cycle. What is the 1000 year cycle? 10000 year cycle? you sound like a religious whacko, how are your carbon indulgences going ? are your sins forgiven ?

To: neolib who wrote (12831)	5/24/2007 12:27:38 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Yes the peer review of Mann hockey stick and common sense understanding of the underlying science is that Mann didn't have sufficient proof. So mann's proffer is only for idiots to make trillion dollar decisions on. I know evolution does not come close to explaining how man became self aware. I believe it does give a reasoning on how many aspects of life evolved simply based upon survival luck. It is an application of probabilities that explain effects but give no real answers as to first origins. What I have read in your posts is the samo samo dumb application of false inductive reasoning.