Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (40663)	5/21/2007 10:05:22 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 78426

And if we step out a 100 feet on either side? hmmmmm..... I have seen these plugs not even be as long as they are wide.. On the other hand, if it is 150 feet long, an average of 60 feet wide, and 1500 feet downplunge, it could be 1.3 million tons. It might be that, but figure out the tons, metal and shares out.. what do you get? How many plus 1 million ton sulfide deposits do we get in Ontario? Factor out the Sudbury thingies and we have South Bay, Kidd Creek, Geco, Kam Kotia, Winston Lake.. ok.. what is left? MLM' Potter and Tribute's Uchi may qualify but the list is short.. Texmont has the potential.. Actually the McIntyre in Timmins was over a million tons. 10 I think and it was a bornite porphyry deposit. I guess Teck's Iso Copperfields might qualify but I think it was south of a million tons. But at 36% copper it did not need to be big. EC<:-}