Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (40766)	5/22/2007 7:37:18 PM
From: Rocket Red	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

no farming for me had uncle's and cousins doing that and going broke

To: E. Charters who wrote (40766)	5/22/2007 10:06:29 PM
From: Rocket Red	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78422

SUBJECT: Could be 648million pounds of nickel... Posted By: Buckshot25 Post Time: 5/22/2007 21:58 « Previous Message Next Message » All in my opinion, please do your own DD. Since most deposits in this part of the world run at least as deep as they do long... 400meters strike x 400meters depth x 60meters true width? x 2.7 specific gravity x 25lb's per tonne (1.14%) =648,000,000pounds While way to early to say, it certainly paints a picture for what we are playing for. With another 17 of these clusters all within a short distance. Very, very exciting. Regards, Buck stockhouse.com