Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (31372)	5/26/2007 1:23:11 AM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

No, dija, he hasn't "proved" anything. You can "convince" someone that something that's false is true (and I must say I'm disappointed in that) but that doesn't make it the truth. Hitler convinced his people and his armies that the Jews and Catholics and others were inferior and should be exterminated. They were convinced of an untruth. That's not truth, that's propaganda. He's also said that I am Brinker and/or Brinker Jr. and Mark, and Liberty, and so many other lies I can't remember them all. Why would anyone believe anything he says. A better question might be what's his problem with me. He stalks me and harasses constantly. The pattern of stalking and harassment becomes very clear when you look through the old posts.I must be important to him for some reason I haven't figured out yet. The only thing he hasn't accomplished is to get me out of here. Well, the only thing besides proving ANYTHING he says about me, that is.

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (31372)	5/26/2007 9:55:23 AM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Dija to his credit said: "From: dijaexyahoo 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 31376 OK, stockalot, IMO you have "proved," via overwhelming circumstantial evidence,that queen and peanut_butter_luvr were the same poster." And then went on to give an opinion not based on any discernable facts but an opinion that may well be valid. "But if you really think queen is a male, or that queen is Ms Topes, or oreo, you are goofy. " I've been called worse than "goofy". You probably notice that Queen has a real aversion to this subject of posting as Peanut Butter on this thread. Instead of contronting that issue where the evidence is overwhelming, Queen goes off on tangent after tangent not related to what is on the table clearly showing evidence that Peanut Butter and Queen are one and the same. So if that is the logical conclusion...has anyone else used "Brinkerhater"? has anyone else used the "underline" function? Had anyone before those two ever used AAR on either Yahoo UTEK thread or this one? Has anyone else used Cheat/stockalot? The penchant for using "Have a nice evening"? ..... At the time did anyone else refer to the screen name Peanut Butter as "PB" other than Peanut Butter and Queen? Now the fury to post irrelevant items doesn't change anything about the above facts. So if one is satisfied that Queen posted as Peanut Butter, there has been no logical explanation to the contrary, then the other obvious conclusion is that Queen lied about using another screen name here under both Peanut Butter and Queen. If that is established, then it is a matter of discerning when the truth is being told and when Queen is simply lying under one or more names.