Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tyc:> who wrote (41168)	5/27/2007 2:17:34 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 78422

Actually, this is what koan said: "YOu can never make a blanket statement wts should generate a 2 to 1 leveraage" My problem with the ratioanale regarding the relative potential of the EPM b and EPM a warrants is the application of a formulaic valuation method. Just as I have a hard time divining how a TA investor can determine what a stock will do just by looking at a graph, I can't see how the 1 year time difference between the a & b's lend themselves to a pricing exercise independent of the underlying stock. If EPM is able to execute their mine plan, I would expect substantial cap growth in the year between the expiration of the a's and the b's. I'll continue to cough up a few cents more per warrant to access the potential of that added year.