Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10515)	5/28/2007 2:55:05 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Bush's warning on 8-6-01 was unique and alarming. But Bush did absolutely nothing. Not a single order or phonecall to anyone. On he single phonecall to the FAA would have stopped 9-11. One order to the FBI to clean up possible tango suspects in the US would have done it too. People say there's "plenty of blame to go around" but Clinton had been gone for almost a year by then. Why is Clinton responsioble? Answer: He isn't at all, Bush is. Bush disbanded CLinton's entire counter-terrorism unit inside the White House and replaced it with -- nothing. Not a single meeting in the White House on terrorism until 9-4-01, where nothing was done, just general discussions took place. Condi Rice's speech due to be delivered 9-11-01 on a list of threats facing our nation did not even mention Al Qaida or terrorism. On 9-11-01 GHW Bush had a business meeting in New York at the Pierre Hotel with a member of the Bin Laden family. Two days after 9-11 all the top Saudis and Bin Ladens were safely glown out of the US without being interrogated. At Tora Bora, Bush had Bin Laden trapped and refused to send soldiers to block the possible escape routes. It all stinks to high hell.