Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raglanroadie who wrote (64143)	5/29/2007 3:33:04 AM
From: manalagi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197041

Nokia says row with Qualcomm may hurt 3G uptake Tuesday May 29, 3:24 am ET SEOUL (Reuters) - Nokia (Helsinki:NOK1V.HE - News), the world's biggest mobile phone maker, said on Tuesday the ongoing patent battle with Qualcomm Inc. (NasdaqGS:QCOM - News) may work against the uptake of "third-generation" mobile technology. Nokia is putting its focus for 3G mobile phones on higher-end models, Chief Technology Officer Tero Ojanpera said, despite moves by smaller rivals to lower device costs for the high-speed wireless service. Nokia, which makes more than one in three of the cell phones sold globally, is mired in a legal dispute over patents with U.S. mobile phone chip maker Qualcomm Inc. after part of a major cross-licensing agreement expired last month. The legal dispute centers on Nokia's use of Qualcomm patents for 3G, but it also has a bearing on Qualcomm's chips business, which according to Nokia uses many Nokia-patented technologies. "We are in negotiations but there's no agreement," Ojanpera told a news conference at the Seoul Digital Forum event. Nokia last week filed its first patent counter-suit against Qualcomm, seeking damages and an injunction against Qualcomm chips. Analysts estimate Nokia has paid Qualcomm around $500 million per year and now aims to get a better deal. "This whole discussion might have an impact on 3G technology," he said, adding alternative technologies such as mobile WiMax were gaining momentum due to uncertainties surrounding the licenses. Mobile operators are shifting from voice-centric 2G services to 3G or its alternatives to offer more lucrative services such as video calls, music downloads and Internet over cell phones. LG Electronics Inc. (066570.KS), world No. 5 mobile phone maker, won a contest in February organized by a consortium of mobile operators to produce affordable 3G handsets, expected to cost around $100, to speed up the change. "3G is not about cheap price but about new capabilities," said Ojanpera, when asked by Reuters about its 3G phone pricing policy on the sidelines of the Seoul event. "It's not the first priority to have a cheap phone." Ojanpera said that Nokia's stronghold emerging markets were less likely to consume many sophisticated phones. "We are addressing the emerging markets and that's where the next billion users is coming, but those are lower-priced phones with maybe not that many capabilities at the beginning." In China, the world's biggest mobile market, Nokia expects to start selling phones for China's own 3G service in the first half of next year, when the network is up and running. Nokia, also competing against Motorola Inc. (NYSE:MOT - News) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (005930.KS), expects to keep a comfortable lead for the rest of 2007 with a market share of more than 36 percent. biz.yahoo.com

To: Raglanroadie who wrote (64143)	5/29/2007 7:25:06 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197041

A dirty-tricks team that searches out for possible infringement on account of others so that they can then buy the patents in order to make themselves a victim is no different than stepping in front of the car IMO. Your analogy is awful. There are plenty of times that a small company (or a person) wont have nearly enough resources to protect their IP. They would need millions to be able to pursue a resolution through the court system and that still entails the risk of losing. You would absolutely screw the small company or individual inventor if you didnt allow them to sell their IP. A company like Broadcom (or Qualcomm) can buy these assets and have the resources to fully protect/utilize these assets. Hmmm, allowing the free market to allocate a resource to the company that is best able to profit from it sounds a hell of a lot like capitalism to me. Slacker