SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (5170)5/29/2007 7:19:23 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Respond to of 25737
 
Did you intentionally ignore my question addressed to you? TIA

Here it is again:

"Aren't you the one who just said we should vote our conscience no matter what? And now you're implying his vote is selfish "as long as he feels secure?" Okay, so, which way is it? You can't have it both ways... everyone can vote how ever they choose, this is what a democracy is all about, don't you agree? TIA"

Message 23576902

GZ™



To: PROLIFE who wrote (5170)5/29/2007 9:37:59 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
PROLIFE, I would appreciate a response to clarify what appears to be two contradictory comments from you, I'm confused, please help me out and clarify, you are posting elsewhere and choosing to ignore my question... TIA

Here it is again: (addressed to you)

"Aren't you the one who just said we should vote our conscience no matter what? And now you're implying his vote is selfish "as long as he feels secure?" Okay, so, which way is it? You can't have it both ways... everyone can vote how ever they choose, this is what a democracy is all about, don't you agree? TIA"

There is no cause for you to think my query for clarification is an attack on you, how else do people discuss without asking questions? As moderator of this thread, it's my responsibility to ensure all comments make sense at some level... and simply ignoring these queries is not a successful strategy...

Message 23576902

GZ™



To: PROLIFE who wrote (5170)5/29/2007 4:14:22 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25737
 
GZ wants a response. You certainly appear to be ignoring him.
siliconinvestor.com

You vote your way. I vote mine. I will say I disagree with your vote and your POV. I WILL NOT use force or suggest the law should use force to make you vote my way.

Disagreeing with you and saying so is exercise of my 1st amendment rights. Forcing you to vote my way is a violation of the very basis of democracy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News