Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (13093)	5/30/2007 7:01:25 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

I gave you Dan Fahey THE EMERGENCE AND DECLINE OF THE DEBATE OVER DEPLETED URANIUM MUNITIONS 1991-2004 Dan Fahey 20 June 2004 wise-uranium.org That is science to any sane person who knows science. and you give me some worthless little fact sheet? If you were employed by the WHO, would you go within 100 yrds of a burned out tank in Iraq or Kosovo? That's all that fact sheet is for. From your sheet.. Responses To Questions 1. Should staff be sent into areas where DU was used in conflict? Healthy staff can be sent into DU conflict areas without fear of adverse health consequences from DU exposure. There may be areas where there is significant DU debris or dusts, but these should have been cordoned off and sign-posted accordingly. Sure, great science. -lol- /edit ps. DU is an international CYA job. It isn't just a single govenment, although they to do play a significant part.