Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (10588)	5/30/2007 1:41:00 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224759

First, OBL never served with the CIA. And in fact only took a side trip once into Afghanistan during the war with the Soviets. He provided aid raised from Saudi Arabia to the Afghan rebels in Peshawar in Pakistan. Exactly, in 1996 he had committed NO CRIME that we knew about. And why the hell would any American presdient demand the head of a son of one of Saudi Arabia's richest families, a man who had served with the CIA in Afghanistan and helped defeat the Soviets, when that man was not known to have committed any crime? Okay, now you're accepting that Clinton gave up a chance to have OBL brought to the US. Notice that OBL was already known to be a terrorist and a danger to the US. Otherwise he wouldn't have been trying to get SA to take him.