SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (15353)5/30/2007 12:15:42 PM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Crimson > The terms put forth by the Iranians are so close to the U.S. position on Iraq that, with little exception, they could have been printed on State Department stationary and no one would have noticed the difference. If these are the terms Washington and Tehran are in fact discussing, then we are witnessing an extraordinary turn in the Iraq war in which the U.S. and Iranian blueprints for Iraq are finally aligning. It does not surprise us, then, that Crocker said after his meeting in Baghdad that the Iranian position "was very close to our own" at the level of policy and principle.

Under NO circumstances, will Izzy allow this. This is complete anathema to everything Izzy and the neocons have been working for for years. Even if Izzy has to start a war with Iran himself, the last thing on the agenda is that peace can prevail. Of course, the US desires nothing more than to get out of Iraq ASAP, so we are looking at a tremendous conflict of interest between the US, which is in pain and tired of war, and its boss, Izzy, who is sticking his spurs in even further and doing whatever he can to keep up the momentum for war.

Looks like it's time for another 9/11-type event.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (15353)6/3/2007 12:51:40 PM
From: Rarebird  Respond to of 22250
 
>>The Meat of the Matter<<

The US complained that Iran was interfering inside Iraq. Iran told the US to leave Iraq.

Let me understand this correctly: Insofar as the US has 160,000 ground forces in Iraq, which are fighting the Iraqi resistance, this means the US is not interfering in IRAQ?