Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (18953)	5/30/2007 2:19:26 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220576

And you say you don't have a chip on your shoulder.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (18953)	5/30/2007 2:58:15 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220576

TJ, you do come out with some silly ideas: <so as to expedite isolation and recovery of stolen land called taiwan> Use your CDMA gadget some more. You need more of those wonderful anodyne phragmented photons to soothe your fevered mind. If 400 nukes is as good as 6000, would 4 be as good as 400? If delivered from somewhere such as Taiwan. My understanding is that China has less sophisticated border controls than does the USA. My theory has it that nukes could have been smuggled into the USA wrapped in opium to help with the movement [to ensure customs officers who are happy to import opium didn't interfere]. I wonder if it's possible that suitcase nukes or polonium 210 hand grenade pills have been placed in various strategic places around China, such as in the water supply, near Tienanmen Square, near Hu Jintao's house or other usually undisturbed location. If Taiwan was to be attacked by a murderous China bunch of megalomaniacs, perhaps that would set of such undesirable devices. Maybe people in China could think of something more sensible and constructive to do than attack people happily going about their own business. When Japan got territorial and megalomaniac, a nuke or two showed them the error of their ways. I suspect Chinese are closely enough related to Japanese that they would learn quite quickly too. <message to empire this year, all satellites are doomed at will > Even without will, my Globalstar satellites were doomed. But another 4 are due to be launched today. It will take a little more than will to destroy all satellites. I suspect that once a satellite destruction process is initiated by China, the USA and other satellite owners would invite them to cease and desist and pay compensation. I'd consider it very unfriendly if China broke my new Globalstar satellites. It would stop their Beijing gateway from being useful. When you sell weapons to somebody, you are interfering by enabling them to attack somebody else. Calling it 'non-interference' is a stretch. The British did that with Maoris. Sold guns to some tribes in exchange for land, which the tribes used to acquire further land, which they could also sell. That was interference. Your post is the hypocritical part. China building an empire is what such stone age people do. Having Genghis genes in profusion and a big surplus of low value young males, it's not surprising to see such attitudes. I am hopeful that if enough of them can get CDMA devices, they'll feel soothed and we can all live happily ever after. Mqurice