SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (8124)5/30/2007 6:17:35 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12231
 
C2, I don't need research. <Do cell phones promote economic growth or are they simply an expression of greater affluence?>

Both. Cell phones create wealth and are an expression of wealth.

China, by keeping CDMA at bay, has avoided wealth.

CDMA, which phragments photons faster than other methods, creates wealth faster than other methods.

Paradoxically, as wealth increases, money becomes less relevant. In the extreme, when wealth is maximum, and economic activity huge, money will be irrelevant as people will just do what they want to do and payment won't matter.

We are not anywhere near that situation yet, though we have little episodes of it such as in grand child minding and education. Neither of us gets paid, but both benefit. Plenty of people do voluntary "work" because they enjoy doing what they are doing.

Cyberphones reduce the amount of work we need to do, so they create economic growth while reducing the need for it. It's an amazing new era we are in, which makes the industrial revolution look trivial.

Mqurice



To: carranza2 who wrote (8124)5/31/2007 11:13:59 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 12231
 
I heard a little sunray was approaching the darkest corners of Scam Diego.

somlosquesom2.castpost.com



To: carranza2 who wrote (8124)6/3/2007 12:19:07 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 12231
 
A stick and some child spanking (early child hooded) is the major corner stone of the amurrican judicial lynching system

redhotjazz.com

That is why, as Ginsburg said, nobody is even trying to copy it, even if it is given for gratis-free with US tax dollars, billions and hundreds of billions and the US military.
(she did not say that later thing then, now she might say it)

However, one should not forget nor minimize the true and great american dilemma, especially as few murricans understand it, idealized and Los Lollywood and regular silly domestic propaganda. (tough stuff, in these ages of the global internet)

Btw, that Ginsburg quote came after she had invited this french superior female judge, to talk to this graduated little legal ones, and that superior french judgess just had told them how smartly they rewrote their constitution to be EU-compatible.

Somebody little one then asked Ginsburg, "why didn't they just copy our old, best in the world stuff, wouldn't that have been easier?? much less difficult to understand" (for little Los Lollywood educated me??)

Interesting stuff coming up... the clash of legal civilizations and markets.

(I just heard Alito had heard the true and only voice in his head, although he spoke like he would have at least 40 different voices talking in his head)

160 was the earlier US champion record??



To: carranza2 who wrote (8124)6/3/2007 2:39:14 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 12231
 
Why is Alito saying that you, ready to go practicing, do not know nor understand as much as those in the 1700s??

They were mostly and barely 25-30 too, maybe better instilled??

OK, he already now thinks he is Polonius (Latin for "Polish") ..

"To thine own self be true", "Neither a borrower nor a lender be" and "brevity is the soul of wit."

In most productions of the 20th century, up to about 1980, Polonius was played as a somewhat senile, garrulous man of about seventy-five or so, and those productions sometimes got a few laughs out of the character's depiction.

----

nobody laughed, they were just waiting to go partying.



To: carranza2 who wrote (8124)7/8/2007 8:39:37 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 12231
 
Was that a murrican lawyer??

"give a murrican an old, ancient (patented) stick, and there is no limit to the (patented) ancient shxt he can stir up"

redhotjazz.com

Or was it a neo-kiwi??

PS AEI says the dollar will decline another 20-30% in the next moons and suns, Bush tends to follow their orders.

Why didn't Quack/Jacobs support EAI that well??

Is there still some hope for PJ under the next neo-regime??