Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (31445)	5/30/2007 6:56:13 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Hooray for Math! With regard to Queen, the only thing that's been "found" is that you have strong opinions on the subject, based on very thin evidence, if you can even call it that. And even if you were right about her and Peanut Butter, that would definitely be a "so what." He has NEVER proved ANY of his numerous and ridiculous charges against me. NOT ONCE. NOT EVER. The only reasons I don't answer his "peanut butter" questions: (1) I've already answered them. (2) I feel no obligation to reinforce his tantrum demands. (3) He's only making HIMSELF look ridiculous with all his numerous charges of various personas and other personal behavior with which he charges me, NONE of which he seems to want to talk about any more, having been reduced to this ONE and having been humiliated so many times before. (4) I must confess I don't mind seeing him continue to jump up and down screaming and stomping feet tantruming and looking ridiculous--so I don't answer again out of what my grandmother would have called sheer orneriness on my part, except she would have pronounced it "ONN-ree-nus". :o) Thank you, Math.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (31445)	5/30/2007 7:20:31 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

math said: <<And even if you were right about her and Peanut Butter, that would definitely be a "so what.">> --I agree with that. If queen really was banned for posting with 2 aliases, I don't blame her for figuring out a way to get back in. That would have to be regarded by any sane person (imo) as a "little white lie." It did not harm a single living person in any way whatsoever! Things like PURPOSELY quoting people out of context for the sole purpose of making them look bad would qualify as a lie which reflected upon the writer's character. Also, for a message board moderator to lie about the reasons for kicking people off the board would qualify as a "real" lie which reflected upon the liar's character. But queen's supposed lie about PB would not qualify as any kind of significant lie, imo.