Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (13298)	6/2/2007 4:11:05 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

It's been nice chatting, but I gotta run... Excellent idea. While you're out though .... I'll contemplate your earlier post[s]. On the one hand, there's a group of articles which categorize CO2 as pollution in the context of greenhouse gases. I've provided you a link to Nationmaster which clearly labels CO2 as pollution with the US in the lead position. I've checked the dictionary, and yes, CO2 as pollution is not excluded. On the other hand, James Bowers, expert in shit holes in third world countries, says it's all lies. James Bowers knows pollution. Pretty persuasive. It's a tough decision, do I believe everyone else or do I believe James Bowers? I need to think on that. I'll get back to you when I've made a decision [or not]. jttmab