Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (85728)	6/3/2007 11:38:30 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 206085

slo is in the center of Calif. Calif isn't dealing with reality. They want to steal their water and energy from neighboring states. That policy is ending. AZ finally said NO!

To: energyplay who wrote (85728)	6/4/2007 4:01:39 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

Of all the errors Jimmy Carter committed, none has earned him more well-justified scorn than his handling of the 1970s energy crisis. True enough, he didn't cause it. But he did make it much, much worse. investors.com It was that blow back effect into Brazil that the country engaged in Ethanol.

To: energyplay who wrote (85728)	6/4/2007 10:00:31 AM
From: SuperChief	Respond to of 206085

Why would SLO (San Luis Obispo) implode ? It is not Detroit... If you mean taxes will go up, sure, but the weather is so good it is hard to believe. For about 2 months in summer, run the A/C on medium for about 4 hours from 3pm until 7 pm. For 3 months is in winter, you need a little heat - even less if you close the windows. The weather is really nice. Traffic isn't too heavy, and there is little pollution. It would seem to me places that use little energy will become more valuable as energy prices rise. The boomers won't like freezing in their beds. I will gladly trade my home in Phoenix for one in SLO. No takers? Didn't think so.