Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackjc who wrote (41875)	6/5/2007 12:03:56 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78417

<WKM: Anonymous buyer, always like to see that.> Does that mean when anonymous shows up as a seller that is bad?

To: jackjc who wrote (41875)	6/5/2007 12:39:57 PM
From: onepath	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

Any take on why the RG/CPY merger failed?

To: jackjc who wrote (41875)	6/5/2007 2:07:16 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78417

rg.v - the mid-.40s gap from february has been keeping me out, didn't get in before and should have ... looks now like the gap won't fill, when low enough many don't, and the market didn't seem to like the merger with cpy.v so now that it's off there may be less pressure ... alright, thinking about some, trying not to dip into margin though, hmmm On house 1 Anonymous - any of us can put in an order that way, i wonder just how significant it is ... one thing this ability has done, is render house position studies completely meaningless ... it's a bad move on the transparency front, imho ... of course there was always jitney, shifting paper from house to house, so not much change really