SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (59575)6/5/2007 2:51:14 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Revisiting Rachel Carson

Betsy's Page

John Tierney looks once again at the bad science behind the alarmism of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring and the tradeoffs in hundreds of thousands of poor people's deaths that have resulted.
    The human costs have been horrific in the poor countries 
where malaria returned after DDT spraying was abandoned.
Malariologists have made a little headway recently in
restoring this weapon against the disease, but they’ve had
to fight against Ms. Carson’s disciples who still divide
the world into good and bad chemicals, with DDT in their
fearsome “dirty dozen.”
    Ms. Carson didn’t urge an outright ban on DDT, but she 
tried to downplay its effectiveness against malaria and
refused to acknowledge what it had accomplished. As Dr.
Baldwin wrote, “No estimates are made of the countless
lives that have been saved because of the destruction of
insect vectors of disease.” He predicted correctly that
people in poor countries would suffer from hunger and
disease if they were denied the pesticides that had
enabled wealthy nations to increase food production and
eliminate scourges.
http://betsyspage.blogspot.com/2007/06/revisiting-rachel-carson.html

nytimes.com



To: Sully- who wrote (59575)6/5/2007 3:28:35 PM
From: Jim S  Respond to of 90947
 
That story just reaffirms my personal solution for the "War on Drugs." The only public funds that should be expended for such people is to offer them a free funeral in the Begger's Lot.

NO tax money for halfway houses, methadone clinics, or even emergency medical care for drug-related cases. As a matter of public health, though, we should bury them at public expense.

The bad ones would die or go clean, and the others would have an example to not follow.