Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (107639)	6/6/2007 1:37:04 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361346

I think "how" is pretty well known. The owner has talked about giving the OK for demolition . It was brought down by explosives, alcohol, and childhood osteomyeolitis. The ? is "why was it brought down?"

To: michael97123 who wrote (107639)	6/6/2007 1:37:17 PM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361346

The movie is not just about the falling of all three WTC buildings through CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, but how it would be possible that this could occur; the bumped up insurance policies to include terrorism just before the incidents; the fact that the buildings had been virtually CONDEMNED TO COME DOWN, because of asbestos and other toxins in the walls (redo was to cost $250 mil); the total inability of the supposed hijackers to actually do what they supposedly did; the utter failure of the North American Defence system because of Pentagon military exercises on the SAME DAY; the laying off of the insurance risk to German and Swiss companies; the huge profits made on United and American puts at many times normal daily volumes of sales to buyers subsequently not identified; the announcement on the BBC of the falling of WTC7 BEFORE it actually occurred; flight recorders found but never released; damage atPentagon could never have been caused by 757 and no trace of significant plane parts in the wreckage; finding the passport of one of the WTC supposed hijackers at the WTC site when virtually everything else was atomized. Those are just a few items. You don't have to become Che Guevara II. You don't have to abandon your present fulfilling life. You can even say: GUCK THIS, I DON'T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT ANY OF IT. Fair enough, just understand that in so doing you may be jeopardizing your present good life more than you think. If I told you about a new competitor of yours that you did not know about who had revolutionary new products in your exact market sector, you might temporarily feel alarmed, but I imagine you would actually want to find out what you were up against competitively. We are all living in a world where the ACTUALITY of it is vastly different than that portrayed on mass TV, major print media etc. What there is to learn is not too pretty. But you can take your choice: you can be open to what IS or you can just be entertained and diverted by people who want to sell you products, services and mindsets. As always, it's your choice. Namaste! Jim