Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold & Gold Stock Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 7:11:42 PM
From: jennifersilversun	Respond to of 29622

Hey Swampy, that's not fair--I like to read you. Just don't have much to say so I don't take up bandwidth saying it <g>. Don't let 'them' win--or we all lose--including you!

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 7:54:41 PM
From: Condor	Respond to of 29622

Stick around Swampy.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 8:05:01 PM
From: Davy Crockett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29622

<<Strange how you personally attack me with no basis and you make no comment on the post I made about the article.>> Forgive me, what was the comment about the article that I posted? I must've missed it somewhere... Why not? You do it all the time. It was you who killed the woodshed thread. With your nonsensical postings. No wonder people fled that thread. fuddle, oops I hit the recommend button. So now u have 2. Let see if you can get 10. Every post that I have made on this thread & on the woodshed you have dissed every poster who disagrees with you. So its nice to see fuddle, that you have outed yourself... and have answered this post, unlike before when you, in your almighty opinion ... would not stoop to our level. So you see fuddle I have 8 years or more history on you. You can't fool me anymore. Anyway, how is that ewave analysis going? You call a top yet? or are you too bearish? Why don't you call that a bottom is in for the PM's. <<Not that care what you think but this is where I stand as it will be my last post on SI forever. One too many jerks that make comments without reading a thing.>> Is that a promise? Good riddance to you. SI will be a better place without you <g> And I am sorry to the posters who read this fine thread for causing grief on this fine thread. To put things in perspective fuddle (SwampDogg) & I go way back to 1999/2000 It is very unlikely that we will ever settle our differences. Apologies to the thread. We at least agree on one thing << Gold is going over $1000 in the next 12 months >>

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 8:05:12 PM
From: A Horse With No Name	Respond to of 29622

swamp man stay i like to read your posts. forget 1 3/4".

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 9:01:37 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical	Respond to of 29622

You're not gonna let a jerk w/61 ignores win are you? You need to stay and post again. That's my rec.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 10:05:53 PM
From: Eva	Respond to of 29622

DAmmit Swampy, you can't do that! I just go on SI to read your comments, and so do many, please reconsider, or come over to Chief's FOrum :) one of your many readers Eva

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/6/2007 10:53:55 PM
From: lrknoff10	Respond to of 29622

Pleaseeeee do not punish the rest of us because of one jerk. I look for your posts daily, even have a good idea of the time you will post and log on to hear what you have to say about that time. You are so appreciated by many of us here. Don't let one idiot get to you.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/7/2007 9:25:28 AM
From: petermccone	Respond to of 29622

Dear Mr. Swampdog, This is a great thread with some really wonderful contributors. Please do not abandon this tread as I consider you one of the best.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/7/2007 9:34:22 AM
From: TheBusDriver	Respond to of 29622

Swamp stick around or I will sic goatman on you.....ask tom it is not pleasent......he can find you anywhere......

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/7/2007 1:05:06 PM
From: Pacing The Cage	Respond to of 29622

Swamper, I'd like to join the chorus asking that you continue posting. I actually started following this thread after seeing that you posted on it. C'mon back, your insights are appreciated.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (6608)	6/8/2007 1:51:13 PM
From: Pacing The Cage	Respond to of 29622

Gold may touch $1000: JP Morgan Bloomberg / Mumbai June 08, 2007 Gold may rise to more than $1,000 an ounce as demand from India, China and exchange traded funds increases and production of precious metal falls, according to JP Morgan Chase & Co., the third-largest US bank. Gold, which has risen 5.2 per cent this year, may reach $850 an ounce in the “medium term,’’ on the way to $1,000, analysts from JP Morgan led by John Bridges said in the report dated June 6. They didn’t specify what the medium term was. Gold-mining companies reduced output to a 10-year low of 2,471 metric tons in 2006, according to London-based researcher GFMS Ltd. Demand for gold from India, the world’s largest buyer, rose 50 percent in the first quarter of 2007 while demand in China gained 31 percent, according to the World Gold Council. “We would continue accumulating gold and silver positions looking to higher prices by year-end,’’ the analysts said. “A four-figure gold price looks quite feasible to us given the tight supply demand situation in the gold market.’’ Gold for immediate delivery fell as much as $1.30, or 0.2 percent, to $669.45 an ounce and traded at $670 at 11:56 am Sydney time. Silver for immediate delivery fell 1 cent to $13.69 an ounce. Demand from this year’s Indian wedding season, the Chinese year of the ‘Golden Pig,’ and purchases by exchange traded funds may boost prices, the analysts led by Bridges said in the report. business-standard.com