Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (42171)	6/9/2007 6:56:44 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78424

And the metal in question has different price futures by far IMO. I see Ni at half the price in 2-3 yrs, and gold much higher. I think Ni can be supplied as mines play catch-up, but Gold, its just not to be had. Only the large central banks stocks, but there is a limit to how much more they can afford to disgorge.

To: marcos who wrote (42171)	6/10/2007 1:57:21 AM
From: sageyrain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78424

Pueblo viejo is a different beastie than VMS. VMSs generally made about the same time as the host rock (hot water carrying metals spews out on the ocean floor and feeds those tubeworms and such on the ocean bottom), Pueblo Viejo was formed much later than the host rocks, probably formed by hot water flowing through cracks in rocks much older than the age of the mineralisation, and probably closely related to a big, classic type volcano or volcanos.