Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim S who wrote (59864)	6/11/2007 6:55:58 PM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

Actually, from what I've seen in the last bill, most if it's provisions would have been acceptable had it mandated a secure boarder before any other provision was instituted (And by secure, I mean in a way that a reasonable person would define it, not via liberal revisionist BS). Additionally, I would demand that there be rigorous enforcement of existing laws until the border is secure. No liberal revisionist BS. I would also demand that current laws be adjusted to assure that any illegals detained for any violation of our laws are held until they are promptly deported (and if the new bill doesn't have this provision, I would demand it's inclusion). I would demand that there be rigorous enforcement of all additional provisions as they are implemented. No excuses. No liberal revisionist BS. I would demand that we alter our immigration laws to gave priority to those who make an immediate net contribution to our economy, taxes and welfare. gratuitously stolen from this post: Message 23608831