SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (340123)6/11/2007 9:36:00 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1571714
 
He was a slave trader; as a profession, that was one or two levels above today's drug smugglers

In terms of the morality of the trade I'd put it well below drug smugglers, today's or any other times.

But your probably right in terms of social standing it was above today's drug smugglers. Perhaps more than your "one or two levels" above. For one thing it was legal, and while legality is not the same as social acceptance it certainly helps. For another many "pillars of society" where customers, (and not covert or indirect customers the way many rich and/or famous people are of drug dealers today).



To: tejek who wrote (340123)6/11/2007 10:27:26 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571714
 
Ted, > He was a slave trader; as a profession, that was one or two levels above today's drug smugglers. Professions like that usually don't draw men of character.

George Washington also owned slaves.

Same with Thomas Jefferson. He even knocked up a few of them.

Tenchusatsu