SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kacy_in_LA who wrote (85003)6/12/2007 8:49:40 AM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 312793
 
Very possible exchange wanted to know what was going on too.

Anyways off to drill some holes



To: kacy_in_LA who wrote (85003)6/12/2007 9:42:41 AM
From: ralfph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312793
 
Kacy on this you are dead wrong. GCR's news release was done because they were concerned about some of the rumours flying around and the fact that it appeared that the stock was running based on the rumours. If you had phoned them at the time of the anouncement you may have drawn a different conclusion .
The company wanted to cut through the shit and simply put out an honest report.
This is what we have as of now. They published everything they were allowed to.

ralfph



To: kacy_in_LA who wrote (85003)6/12/2007 10:28:49 AM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312793
 
It's not uncommon for explorers to report that they've intersected a significant amount of a given mineral type. It's part of normal disclosure of a material change - to kill the rumours. It's perfectly honest and ethical. I trust GCR more than many.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News