SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (14353)6/13/2007 1:57:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14758
 
Fine tuning is certainly real and not just something I've made up. Here are some sources which address the issue (all of them by non-believers of some sort - I figured including any religious people would put you off too much):

amazon.co.uk
The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life? by Paul Davies

amazon.com
Universes by John Leslie

amazon.com
The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford Paperbacks)
by John D. Barrow (Author), Frank J. Tipler (Author), John A. Wheeler (Author)

amazon.com
The Accidental Universe by Paul Davies

amazon.com
The symbiotic universe: Life and mind in the cosmos by George Greenstein, Amherst astronomy professor

amazon.com
Just Six Numbers : The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe by Martin J. Rees

amazon.com
Intelligent Universe by Fred Hoyle

I repeat - the folks above are all non-believers of some sort or other. A hostile witness is the best kind. These people wouldn't be writing about the issue is there weren't something really there. For example, Sir Fred Hoyle was an atheist despite writing things like this"

"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
Sir Fred Hoyle, "The Universe: Past and Present Reflections." Engineering and Science, November, 1981. p 8-12

-----------------------------------

These also address the issue of fine tuning but I believe they are by Christians. So be warned.

home.messiah.edu
Robin Collins Evidence of Fine Tuning

web.ecs.baylor.edu
Is There Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God?
How the Recent Discoveries Support a Designed Universe
Dr. Walter L. Bradley

-----------------------

Life elsewhere??? You didn't express an opinion....out of trillions and trillions of galaxies, stars, and planets, do you really think lil ole planet earth was alone selected to harbor a form of life?

I don't consider this an important issue. I suspect life is pretty rare in the universe because there are so many things that would have to be just right for life to exist.

space.com

It's even possible we're the only life in the universe. But why should we care?

Do you think the Creator cares about Earth and you personally?

Sure. And I even think the things I posted about in my earlier post are rational reasons to think the universe is "rigged".



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (14353)6/13/2007 8:12:27 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14758
 
His "fine tuning" argument is as bogus as a $3 bill. There could be a quadrillion quadrillion non-fine-tuned universes in existence and he would have no knowledge of them. How could he? He has no way of getting to them and they don't support life so he could not evolve in them. His is an argument that at its start assumes its own conclusion.