SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (81645)6/13/2007 9:37:28 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 93284
 
Was she hoarding or hording???? lol



To: Land Shark who wrote (81645)6/13/2007 1:56:28 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
bush and his entire administration are the WORST IN HISTORY...
they cannot get ANYTHING RIGHT....
they are a world embarrassment....think of Katrina....and now this over and over again...destroying peoples summers and vacations and business trips....
Passport waiver confusion grounds travelers
A government waiver to ease a backlog has a side effect: Some bound for Mexico needed to show a birth certificate.
By Peter Pae and Jane Engle
Times Staff Writers

June 13, 2007

Just when it seemed the passport logjam was starting to ease, passengers faced another obstacle Tuesday: Some airlines refused to let them board planes because they didn't have birth certificates.

In yet another embarrassment for the State Department, a temporary measure enacted Friday to reduce a huge backlog of passports is now leading to more unexpected aggravation.

"It's a real bummer," said Alex Alvarado, a 10-year-old Needles resident who was blocked from boarding a plane to Mexico City for a summer soccer camp because he didn't have a birth certificate — something that Mexico requires if you don't have a passport.

In a move to lessen passport backlogs nationwide last week, the U.S. government told travelers that they could visit Mexico, Canada, Bermuda and the Caribbean this summer with only a government-issued photo ID and a receipt showing that they had applied for a passport.

But when Alvarado and his parents got to the ticket counter, they were turned away because Mexico requires proof of U.S. citizenship with a passport, a birth certificate or certified copy of it, or a naturalization document.

Alvarado was one of about a dozen passengers trying to board a Mexicana Airlines flight Tuesday at Los Angeles International Airport on the misconception that the requirements announced Friday by the State Department were the only things needed to fly.

The State Department had waived passport requirements in hopes of speeding up the passport application process for all other international travel. The effort to unclog the logjam is expected to take the entire summer.

For Alvarado there was one more hitch: The State Department has his birth certificate along with the passport application that had yet to be processed even though his paperwork had been sent in three months ago.

"I just don't know what to say or what to do," said Alvarado's father, Luis, who drove four hours from the San Bernardino County town to send his son off to a "dream" soccer camp.

Mexicana officials said that Mexico's entry requirement was clearly noted in the ticket information but that some passengers may have been confused by last Friday's announcement of the U.S. passport waiver, which applies only to leaving and entering the U.S. Mexicana spokeswoman Theresa Bravo said Tuesday that the airline had not heard any complaints from U.S. travelers being turned away at LAX because of the mix-up.

As the Alvarados mulled over what they would do next, there was one piece of good news that came out of Washington on Tuesday. Travelers who paid an extra $60 to get their U.S. passports expedited but still had to wait for them beyond the time period that they were promised can get a refund from the government.

The decision on the refund was disclosed in a State Department document received by some members of Congress. It was part of an attempt to deal with an unprecedented backlog that has led many in the U.S. to either delay or cancel summer trips.

The agency is expected to process 18 million passports this year, up 50% from last year, and the wait time has grown to 12 weeks or more from six weeks a year earlier.

The delays largely have stemmed from a new rule that requires U.S. citizens to have passports in order to fly to Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean or Bermuda. The government last week announced that it would suspend the rule through Sept. 30, providing that travelers to those destinations bring a receipt showing they have applied for a passport.

But in its haste to announce the waiver, the passport agency neglected to advise travelers that each country has its own requirements for entry.

"It's created a lot of frustration among travelers," said Anthony Black, a spokesman for Delta Air Lines. The carrier has had to turn away passengers, though the exact number was not immediately clear Tuesday. "It's unfortunate because in order to protect the passengers we had to deny them boarding."

Many travelers to the destinations in the passport waiver have been left in a Catch-22.

The problem is that "a lot of folks" turned in the original or a certified copy of their birth certificate when they applied for a passport, and now "it's stuck somewhere in Houston," one of the regional passport agencies, said Rep. Heather A. Wilson (R-N.M.), who has been one of the more vocal critics of the passport delays.

The White House defended its decision to enact the temporary waiver.

"My sense is that it will assist the vast majority of individuals who might have applied for a passport," said Russ Knocke, spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees U.S. customs operations.

A State Department official said the agency was aware that other nations have entry requirements that may be different from those in the U.S., adding that it was gathering information from the countries included in the waiver as to what those current requirements are.

The official said the department would post that information on the website travel.state.gov . as it became available.

In the meantime, he recommended that travelers contact the embassy or consulate of the country they plan to visit for specific entry requirements.

--

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
peter.pae@latimes.com

jane.engle@latimes.com

--

(INFOBOX BELOW)

Getting from here to there

Holding a U.S. passport is the easiest way to travel to Mexico and Canada. But under the temporary waiver, effective until Sept. 30, you can use a government-issued photo ID and "proof" of passport application to leave from and return to the U.S. from those countries.

Those countries, however, have their own entry requirements:

Mexico: A U.S. passport or proof of U.S. citizenship, which may be an original or certified copy of a birth certificate, or a certificate of naturalization with a photo of the traveler.

Canada: A U.S. passport is not required to enter Canada. But if you don't have it, you must have an original birth certificate — a certified copy is not acceptable — and photo identification.

For most up-to-date requirements, check with the embassy or the consulate of the country you are visiting.

Travelers who paid $60 for expedited service and "did not receive their passport on an expedited basis" should request a refund by writing to the following address:

Department of State

Passport Services/PPS/Refunds

2100 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037-3202.

The refund request should include the applicant's passport number (if available), name, date and place of birth, approximate date of the passport application, a mailing address and telephone number.

The department will not refund the regular passport application and execution fees, which total $97 for new passports and $67 for renewals for adults age 16 and older. Different fees apply to those under age 16. For details, visit travel.state.gov .

— JANE ENGLE



To: Land Shark who wrote (81645)6/13/2007 2:06:51 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
another COMPLETE FAILURE.....
Afghan deaths 'tragic incident'
From the Associated Press
June 13, 2007

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN — Afghan police and U.S.-led coalition troops mistook each other for the enemy in a battle before dawn Tuesday that left eight of the Afghans dead, officials said.

The deadly lapse in communication underscored the wide gaps — and apparent mistrust — between U.S. and Afghan security forces. President Hamid Karzai's office labeled the deaths "a tragic incident" caused by a lack of cooperation and communication.

U.S. officials have said they are wary of telling Afghan forces about nighttime raids by U.S. Special Forces, the kind of operation apparently being conducted early Tuesday, for fear the target might be tipped off.

The U.S.-led coalition said a joint coalition-Afghan force on a mission early Tuesday against a suspected Taliban safe house was fired on first and responded with its own weapons, then summoned air support. It said no U.S. casualties were reported.

A presidential spokesman also said police initiated the shooting, but officers at the isolated post in Nangarhar province said U.S. troops fired first.

"The Americans came close to our checkpoint with the lights of their vehicles off," said Esanullah, commander of the roadblock. "We shouted at them to stop, but they didn't, and they opened fire on us."

He said eight policemen were killed and four wounded.

Officers fired 49 rocket-propelled grenades and called for help from reserve police during the three-hour battle, said Esanullah, who uses one name.

Karzai's spokesman, Karim Rahimi, said the incident underscored why the president has repeatedly called for increased cooperation between Afghan and international troops.