Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (340274)	6/13/2007 3:55:42 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575614

How could I possibly exaggerate...iraq is a catastrophe by any measure. Even if one assumes the 2nd part of your sentence it doesn't imply the the first is meaningful. A horrible catastrophe can still be greatly exaggerated. In any case there is more to it then just catastrophe. There were NO WMDs there several years after UNSCOM had left the country. That isn't literally true. I wouldn't bother to point it out but your so repetitive in that technically false assumption. More importantly it doesn't really address the issue under discussion. No significant WMD, or even absolutely no WMD, doesn't equate with the inspections regime not having difficulty, or the sanctions regime being solid.