Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (340284)	6/13/2007 4:59:14 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575697

See what I mean? Sure...according to your "literal" interpretation there are "WMDs" in your local home depot. Their are chemical weapons in a home depot? Note I'm not referring to any dangerous chemicals as WMD. Also I'm only pointing out the fact that you where technically wrong, because you keep insisting that their where absolutely no WMD in Iraq, and you insist it in such a way as if your trying to reply that anyone who disagrees is obviously wrong, or even deluded, when in fact they are right. There where no significant amounts of WMD in Iraq by the time of the invasion. That's a much more important fact then whether there where any WMD at all. If you where pointing that out you would have one solid and true line to put in your arguments, instead you keep making false statements and then attacking people who disagree with them. But no significant WMD doesn't equate to no problem with WMD in the future.