Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (14396)	6/13/2007 11:06:21 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

Your mocking responses were not relevant to the comments you were mocking. Hearing at a distance or a sound being carried to a far a way place is not relevant to the example I gave of a sound that has dispersed, same with your comments on light, and I'm pretty sure you know it. Black holes are refered to as 'theoretical' by every credible science document I can find. "They are not theoretical.... " You can invent what ever criteria you want to determine what is theory and what is fact but according to scientific resources, Black Holes are theoretical. I don't mind discussing opposing view points that truly are that. If you are afraid to have a truly reasoned discussion, why not just admit it? Then go someplace else and figure out what has you so frightened.