SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (20543)6/17/2007 9:14:13 AM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Vindicated in the sense you and your conservative pals were belittling his efforts and now it turns out he was on to something. He couldn't find any WMDs, said he couldn't find any, asked for more time but America's invastion put that request to bed. So today we have more than 3,000 Americans dead, tens of thousands of American wounded and now handicapped, tens of thousands of Iraqis dead and a country on the brink of civil war. Blix wasn't finding WMDs because there were none to be found. At the same time U.S. analysts who were suspicious, and told superiors their concerns, that there were no WMDs, saw their careers sidelined, says Bob Woodward. Blix was vindicated because he found nothing, the same as us. Blix's efforts cost no lives. Bush's efforts to make the same discovery has and is costing us dearly. Smart president, huh!



To: jlallen who wrote (20543)6/20/2007 10:09:04 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
"I don't believe that he ever made a statement (prior to the invasion) that he believed there were no WMD in Iraq"

If the Blixie Chix had nobody seems to have published it.