Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (340550)	6/16/2007 1:35:56 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574953

CJ, > No it doesn't. Why would you think that? Just because she decides to carry the baby to term, its condition hasn't changed. Not until birth. Look at the way expectant mothers refer to their "fetuses." Look at the way they prepare the baby's room. Have a baby shower. When the "fetus" kicks, they refer to the "fetus" as if it already has a personality. A mere "mass of tissue" does not bring out motherly instincts like that. But you are right in saying that the condition hasn't changed depending on what the mother decides. It's a life no matter what. It may be her legal decision to kill the unborn child, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking the procedure is no worse than the removal of a tumor. Tenchusatsu