Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (13833)	6/16/2007 7:54:34 AM
From: bearshark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

I was watching the financial channel and heard one of the stiffs explain that costs must be cut so that GM and Ford could sell more cars. Outside of the rejuvenated Cadillac and the Corvette, I don't see an appealing GM or Ford car. Chrysler isn't worth mentioning. Ford and GM management should seek an "earmark" grant so they can buy Toyota and bring Toyota to its knees.

To: jttmab who wrote (13833)	6/16/2007 10:42:34 AM
From: miraje	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Could you explain how the UAW keeps US designed cars off the safest cars list? Right.. CNN knows all about cars. LOL!! Try the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Picks. Quite a few Ford products there (including the Mercury Sable/Montego that my wife drives. About the safest large car around).. iihs.org or.. Twenty-four 2007 model year vehicles were recently awarded the highest rating, five stars, in front and side crash testing under the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) new assessment program.. roadandtravel.com These include vehicles from Ford, GM, and Chrysler.. Oh yes, and you were going on about how to die in a politically correct manner, crashing in a CAFE'nated mini car. Read all about it here before you start yapping about what other people should or shouldn't drive.. crashtest.com