SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Madharry who wrote (108089)6/18/2007 7:54:59 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 132070
 
EFT

Hands-on treatment offers hope for victims of trauma

It is more than 30 years since the incident that changed Gary Williams's life, but it has cast a long shadow. While on patrol in Northern Ireland with the British Army, Williams's unit was confronted in a remote area of County Armagh by a group of armed republicans, and a gun battle broke out.

Williams's patrol partner, who was also his best friend, was advancing towards the men while Williams was supposed to be offering covering fire. His gun jammed and he couldn't clear it in time; his friend took a direct hit and died instantly.

The shoot-out, in 1976, lasted no more than 10 seconds but it was to torment Williams for decades. As well as living with other horrifying images from two tours in Northern Ireland, Williams was inconsolable over the death of his friend, Peter, and blamed himself for what had happened. For 30 years he struggled with regular bouts of depression, for which there seemed to be no lasting cure, until he was diagnosed six months ago with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Williams admits the reason it took so long for the diagnosis was because he had pushed the details of the shoot-out to the back of his mind. He refused to talk about it to anyone for 30 years, unaware of its psychological importance, which makes it even more remarkable that, having just completed a pioneering treatment for PTSD at NHS Forth Valley, Williams is now free of most of its symptoms and says he feels as if he has been given his life back.

Williams joined the RAF in the early 1970s and was in Northern Ireland seconded to an Army unit, co-ordinating ground-to-air communications. He had already experienced other violent incidents, and taken part in clear-up operations after several fatal vehicle bombings.

"I'd just turned 18 and hadn't seen anything like that in my life, the maiming and mutilation. It horrified me," says Williams, 50, from Stirlingshire. He says there was little support from the armed services in dealing with traumatic incidents. "You dealt with things in your own way, often by going out and getting blind drunk," he says. After the shooting of his friend, however, Williams spent three months in the RAF's neuro-psychiatric unit, which offered some relief but never got to the root of the problem.

Williams left the RAF after 12 years and, like most veterans, had to deal with his health problems himself, through the NHS. It was the start of three decades of recurring depression and seeing numerous therapists, most of whose treatments were unsucessful. Even though he completed a degree at York University, and worked briefly in IT training, he says his problems became insurmountable.

When you ask a person to talk about their trauma, the fear centre of the brain fires up as they relive their experiences


"Doctors were treating me for depression, and that's what I thought I had. The incident with my friend Peter never came up. I never brought it up. I never spoke about it to anyone in all those years. I didn't understand that the depression was a symptom of PTSD," he says. "In the past, not much was known about PTSD, but after the Falklands, and the Gulf War, it was starting to be recognised," he says.

Late last year, Williams started having horrific nightmares and flashbacks of his time in Northern Ireland, and told his current therapist, who recognised his condition as PTSD and referred him for specialist treatment. Williams was sent to Therese McGoldrick, a behavioural psychotherapist at NHS Forth Valley, who had been having outstanding success treating difficult cases of PTSD, particularly using newer therapies.

She decided to give Williams four sessions of a ground-breaking treatment called the emotional freedom technique (EFT) which is an "energy therapy" available only through a few health boards, of which one is Forth Valley.

The board offers EFT along with a more mainstream treatment called EMDR (eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing), which McGoldrick pioneered at Forth Valley in the mid-1990s. Her research into EMDR won her and her colleagues international recognition and has opened the way for the use of newer therapies such as EFT. They are about to conduct a trial, the first of its kind in the world, on EFT.

EFT is based on an idea that energy flows around the body along 14 meridian lines, which can become blocked by negative emotions. During EFT, the therapist taps these points on the face, body and hands with the fingertips while focusing on emotions surrounding the original trauma.

McGoldrick has worked for more than 20 years with trauma sufferers from disasters such as the Lockerbie bombing, the Dunblane massacre and the Piper Alpha explosion, and has treated veterans from a number of combat zones, as well as victims of serious crimes. She soon found that conventional "talking therapies", while useful for many conditions, did not help with trauma. While it's a controversial point, McGoldrick believes these therapies don't really work, because trauma involves part of the brain not accessible through language. McGoldrick says traumatic experiences are stored in the part of the brain that controls emotions, where they can become trapped and are not processed. Instead of becoming filed as a memory, they persist as if they have just happened.

"When you ask a person to talk about the trauma, the fear centre of the brain tends to fire up again as they relive the trauma situation," says McGoldrick. The tapping procedures of EFT help to release the experience from the emotional part of the brain, she believes.

After his four sessions of EFT with McGoldrick, Williams says: "I'm gobsmacked at the speed and effectiveness of the treatment. You feel the benefits within minutes of going through the tapping routines. With EFT I was able to talk about the shooting incident for the first time. With each session, my memory of the incident became more acceptable, and my emotions less negative. I do have the images of the past, but they cause me no pain now. I totally accept the shoot-out incident now and that I had no control over it, it wasn't my fault. I don't blame myself anymore."

McGoldrick says that both the new techniques are proving invaluable with significant traumas associated with war, rape or serious accidents, but they are also useful in treating "small" traumas. "Recent research has indicated that a number of normal' life events such as redundancy or bereavement can give rise to profound symptoms of PTSD," she says. This could see them being used to treat a wide range of psychological disorders.

McGoldrick says EFT may offer hope to veterans returning from Iraq. Williams adds: "I'm sure veterans will be going through some of what I experienced, but I hope and pray they will receive proper treatment and won't suffer for as long as I did."

EMDR Institute website
Emotional Freedom Techniques website

© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.



Post this article to:
Del.icio.us :: Newsvine :: NowPublic :: Reddit :: Yahoo

Add Comment
Posted by: Piers Bishop on 9:33am Mon 4 Jun 07
EFT is one of the three currently known techniques that can work quite rapidly in PTSD, the others being EMDR and the Rewind technique. They share a common mechanism which is nothing to do with 'energy' medicine - we have done some trials 'tapping' in places that are not supposed to be 'energy meridians' and it still works. However, it is not, in our view, the best way to deal with trauma - the Rewind is less invasive, completely non-voyeuristic and easier to keep under control. We have a network of therapists who are good at using the Rewind in trauma, see www.hgi.org.uk/regis ter , and I use it myself as the first chice soldiers who have been traumatised, however badly. See www.themeadowpractic e.co.uk for more information.
EFT is one of the three currently known techniques that can work quite rapidly in PTSD, the others being EMDR and the Rewind technique. They share a common mechanism which is nothing to do with 'energy' medicine - we have done some trials 'tapping' in places that are not supposed to be 'energy meridians' and it still works. However, it is not, in our view, the best way to deal with trauma - the Rewind is less invasive, completely non-voyeuristic and easier to keep under control. We have a network of therapists who are good at using the Rewind in trauma, see www.hgi.org.uk/regis
ter , and I use it myself as the first chice soldiers who have been traumatised, however badly. See www.themeadowpractic
e.co.uk for more information.Quote | Report this postPosted by: alyson raworth on 6:45pm Mon 4 Jun 07
I too use EFT and have found it to be essential for therapeutic healing. I am pleased that a thorough trial is underway, or going to be, as it the sure way of getting EFT in to the public's mind. Alyson Raworth
I too use EFT and have found it to be essential for therapeutic healing. I am pleased that a thorough trial is underway, or going to be, as it the sure way of getting EFT in to the public's mind. Alyson RaworthQuote | Report this postPosted by: zeno on 12:36pm Tue 5 Jun 07
"EFT is based on an idea that energy flows around the body along 14 meridian lines, which can become blocked by negative emotions. " It may well be an 'idea' in someone's mind, but there is absolutely no basis in fact for this assertion. There are no 'energy flows' or meridians in the body. Quack pseudo science again.
"EFT is based on an idea that energy flows around the body along 14 meridian lines, which can become blocked by negative emotions. "

It may well be an 'idea' in someone's mind, but there is absolutely no basis in fact for this assertion. There are no 'energy flows' or meridians in the body.

Quack pseudo science again.Quote | Report this postPosted by: zeno on 12:37pm Tue 5 Jun 07
"EFT is based on an idea that energy flows around the body along 14 meridian lines, which can become blocked by negative emotions. " It may well be an 'idea' in someone's mind, but there is absolutely no basis in fact for this assertion. There are no 'energy flows' or meridians in the body. Quack pseudo science again.
"EFT is based on an idea that energy flows around the body along 14 meridian lines, which can become blocked by negative emotions. "

It may well be an 'idea' in someone's mind, but there is absolutely no basis in fact for this assertion. There are no 'energy flows' or meridians in the body.

Quack pseudo science again.Quote | Report this postPosted by: duke, central scotland on 2:02pm Tue 5 Jun 07
I find Mr Bishop's comments misleading in terms of his statement on the underlying mechanism of the treatment approaches. All such speculation is purely hypothetical at the present time as there exists no empirical evidence to support any definitive theory of the neuropathology of trauma and why certain treatments appear to work. We are constantly learning more about the uncharted territory of the brain, which is only added to with controlled research trials such as the wealth of evidence for EMDR (cited in NICE guidelines for PTSD) and from the increasing body of research in support of EFT. Zeno may be interested in the research findings of French radiographer de Vernejoul (1985) and the Russian scientists Narvaez, Rohsmann and Stegenda (2002) and Pert (2002) to name but a few in relation to the existence of meridians and the body having an energy system.
I find Mr Bishop's comments misleading in terms of his statement on the underlying mechanism of the treatment approaches. All such speculation is purely hypothetical at the present time as there exists no empirical evidence to support any definitive theory of the neuropathology of trauma and why certain treatments appear to work. We are constantly learning more about the uncharted territory of the brain, which is only added to with controlled research trials such as the wealth of evidence for EMDR (cited in NICE guidelines for PTSD) and from the increasing body of research in support of EFT.

Zeno may be interested in the research findings of French radiographer de Vernejoul (1985) and the Russian scientists Narvaez, Rohsmann and Stegenda (2002) and Pert (2002) to name but a few in relation to the existence of meridians and the body having an energy system. Quote | Report this postPosted by: zeno on 12:43am Wed 6 Jun 07
Duke Thanks for your reply. I will certainly look up the evidence you cite, but, as far as I'm aware, meridians are not on the curriculum of medical students. I am always prepared to modify my views in the light of evidence, but I doubt very much I'll have start thinking about the implications of meridians in my body.
Duke

Thanks for your reply. I will certainly look up the evidence you cite, but, as far as I'm aware, meridians are not on the curriculum of medical students.

I am always prepared to modify my views in the light of evidence, but I doubt very much I'll have start thinking about the implications of meridians in my body.Quote | Report this postPosted by: alabaster on 10:19am Wed 6 Jun 07
Of course the body has energy systems. Nerve impulses flow along nerves, and chemical energy is carried through the blood stream. I would be amazed however if EFT practitioners could give a proper definition of just what this claimed energy is and how it flows through the body and gets blocked by negative emotions - in particular what is physically different about negative emotions that allows them to block energy flows as opposed to positive emotions? zeno's right - it's pseudoscience.
Of course the body has energy systems. Nerve impulses flow along nerves, and chemical energy is carried through the blood stream. I would be amazed however if EFT practitioners could give a proper definition of just what this claimed energy is and how it flows through the body and gets blocked by negative emotions - in particular what is physically different about negative emotions that allows them to block energy flows as opposed to positive emotions?

zeno's right - it's pseudoscience.Quote | Report this postPosted by: Alan Morison on 1:08pm Wed 6 Jun 07
To those who only BELIEVE it is pseudo science I would say this: inform yourselves before coming to a conclusion. In 1992 a French experiment with tracer dyes in the bodies of over 300 particicpants formally proved the existence of the meridians (something the Chinese have known about for over 4000 years). Acupuncture has also been shown scientifically to work and is now formally accepted. EFT uses the same points that acupuncture does, only it does not use needles, just the fingertips for tapping on the points. I am a trainer of EFT and practitioner with over 400 clients who will testify to the immediate benefit they obtained from EFT. I have also worked extensively on myself and can truly say it is life changing. And EFT works whether you believe in it or not. More information can be found on my website www.EFTuk.org
To those who only BELIEVE it is pseudo science I would say this: inform yourselves before coming to a conclusion. In 1992 a French experiment with tracer dyes in the bodies of over 300 particicpants formally proved the existence of the meridians (something the Chinese have known about for over 4000 years). Acupuncture has also been shown scientifically to work and is now formally accepted.

EFT uses the same points that acupuncture does, only it does not use needles, just the fingertips for tapping on the points. I am a trainer of EFT and practitioner with over 400 clients who will testify to the immediate benefit they obtained from EFT. I have also worked extensively on myself and can truly say it is life changing. And EFT works whether you believe in it or not. More information can be found on my website www.EFTuk.orgQuote | Report this postPosted by: alabaster on 1:48pm Wed 6 Jun 07
Yes, I've read the paper for that experiment. It demonstrates an apparent [italic]material[/italic] flow, not an energy flow, and there's nothing to indicate that 'bad thoughts' have any blocking effect. That acupuncture may have some effect is irrelevant to the claims of negative emotions blocking some woollily defined energy channels - for which I'm yet to see any decent evidence whatsoever. It's also not the only French experiment on the matter. ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez ?cmd=Retrieve&db=Pub Med&dopt=Abstract&li st_uids=2841660 contains in the abstract [quote]These findings indicate a lymphatic and venous drainage of the radioactive tracer at the site of injection followed by transportation through the veins, rather than visualization of acupuncture meridians as suggested by some authors.[/quote] so there's seemingly nothing there that isn't explained in conventional physiology.
Yes, I've read the paper for that experiment. It demonstrates an apparent material flow, not an energy flow, and there's nothing to indicate that 'bad thoughts' have any blocking effect. That acupuncture may have some effect is irrelevant to the claims of negative emotions blocking some woollily defined energy channels - for which I'm yet to see any decent evidence whatsoever.
It's also not the only French experiment on the matter. ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/sites/entrez
?cmd=Retrieve&db=Pub
Med&dopt=Abstract&li
st_uids=2841660 contains in the abstract

These findings indicate a lymphatic and venous drainage of the radioactive tracer at the site of injection followed by transportation through the veins, rather than visualization of acupuncture meridians as suggested by some authors.

so there's seemingly nothing there that isn't explained in conventional physiology.Quote | Report this postPosted by: Alan Morison, Edinburgh on 11:22pm Wed 6 Jun 07
The simple fact is this: EFT (and similar therapies) work. Acupuncture has been proved scientifically to be effective. EFT has been shown to work, even in the difficult environment of a TV studio. The evidence is there.
The simple fact is this: EFT (and similar therapies) work. Acupuncture has been proved scientifically to be effective. EFT has been shown to work, even in the difficult environment of a TV studio. The evidence is there.



To: Madharry who wrote (108089)6/19/2007 12:23:06 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 132070
 
May 24, 2007

Can cyborg moths bring down terrorists?
A moth which has a computer chip implanted in it while in the cocoon will enable soldiers to spy on insurgents, the US military hopes
(Bristol Zoo/PA)
Scientists are growing flesh around computer parts to create cyborg moths, which can be controlled remotely

Jonathan Richards
At some point in the not too distant future, a moth will take flight in the hills of northern Pakistan, and flap towards a suspected terrorist training camp.

But this will be no ordinary moth.

Inside it will be a computer chip that was implanted when the creature was still a pupa, in the cocoon, meaning that the moth’s entire nervous system can be controlled remotely.

The moth will thus be capable of landing in the camp without arousing suspicion, all the while beaming video and other information back to its masters via what its developers refer to as a “reliable tissue-machine interface.”

Related Links
Scientists create remote-controlled pigeon
The creation of insects whose flesh grows around computer parts – known from science fiction as ‘cyborgs’ – has been described as one of the most ambitious robotics projects ever conceived by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa), the research and development arm of the US Department of Defense.

Rod Brooks, director of the computer science and artificial intelligence lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which is involved with the research, said that robotics was increasingly at the forefront of US military research, and that the remote-controlled moths, described by DARPA as Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems, or MEMS, were one of a number of technologies soon to be deployed in combat zones.

“This is going to happen," said Mr Brooks. "It’s not science like developing the nuclear bomb, which costs billions of dollars. It can be done relatively cheaply.”

“Moths are creatures that need little food and can fly all kinds of places," he continued. "A bunch of experiments have been done over the past couple of years where simple animals, such as rats and cockroaches, have been operated on and driven by joysticks, but this is the first time where the chip has been injected in the pupa stage and ‘grown’ inside it.

“Once the moth hatches, machine learning is used to control it.”

Mr Brooks, who has worked on robotic technology for more than 30 years and whose company iRobot already supplies the US military with robots that defuse explosive devices laid by insurgents, said that the military would be increasingly reliant on ‘semi-autonomous’ devices, including ones which could fire.

“The DoD has said it wants one third of all missions to be unmanned by 2015, and there’s no doubt their things will become weaponised, so the question comes: should they given targeting authority?

“The prevailing view in the army at the moment seems to be that they shouldn’t, but perhaps it’s time to consider updating treaties like the Geneva Convention to include clauses which regulate their use.”

Debates such as those over stem cell research would “pale in comparison” to the increasingly blurred distinction between creatures – including humans – and machines, Mr Brooks, told an audience at the University of Southampton’s School of Electronics and Computer Science.

“Biological engineering is coming. There are already more than 100,000 people with cochlear implants, which have a direct neural connection, and chips are being inserted in people’s retinas to combat macular degeneration. By the 2012 Olympics, we’re going to be dealing with systems which can aid the oxygen uptake of athletes.

“There’s going to be more and more technology in our bodies, and to stomp on all this technology and try to prevent it happening is just? well, there’s going to be a lot of moral debates,” he said.

Another robot developed as part of the US military’s ‘Future Combat Systems’ program was a small, unmanned vehicle known as a SUGV (pronounced ‘sug-vee’) which could be dispatched in front of troops to gauge the threat in an urban environment, Mr Brooks said.

The 13.6kg device, which measures less than a metre squared and can survive a drop of 10m onto concrete, has a small ‘head’ with infra-red and regular cameras which send information back to a command unit, as well as an audio-sensing feature called ‘Red Owl’ which can determine the direction from which enemy fire originates.

“It’s designed to be the troop's eyes and ears and, unlike one of its predecessors, this one can swim, too,” Mr Brooks said.