Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: siempre33 who wrote (42898)	6/20/2007 9:54:41 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78426

If you look at the table linked in that article (http://www.resourcestockguide.com/mining/comparison_table_page.php?p=1\|1\|3\|0\|0\|33\|0 ), it's a very strong endorsement for Copper Fox, even ahead of their upwardly revised resource estimate. Even though Copper Fox is in much more desirable Canada and their project is much further advanced than SA's very early exploration stage (they'll need to do a huge amount of dilution to drill out their resources and conduct feasibility studies), CUU's EVPU is listed at $2.1 while this author is arguing for a $63 EVPU for SA to make it a potential triple. If the same author does the same due diligence for Copper Fox, he would be arguing for a "many bagger." While his argument makes for good press, very early stage explorers with low-grade initial drill results in politically risky areas don't merit the valuation he argues for. I'm still long a little SA for a trade, so I hope the stock continues to move higher, but I won't be holding it longer term.