To: Sully- who wrote (60198 ) 6/21/2007 5:24:23 AM From: Sully- Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947 There isn’t enough money in the U.S. to pay for free, wait-free top-quality universal health care. The law of supply and demand can no more be repealed than the law that all documentary films must be left-wing. Sicko Posted by Mark Noonan Blogs for Bush June 20, 2007 Kyle Smith takes a look at Michael Moore's latest lie-fest - a must read, as we'll soon be inundated with stories of how brilliant Moore is and how great Hillarycare will be once she's elected. This one paragraph in the review shows the flaw not just in Moore's call for socialised medicine, but for any scheme to make life grand by putting any sort of bureaucrat into the mix: Not everyone can have everything they want because there is not an unlimited supply of anything (except maybe air); that’s why Canada and Britain have lotteries to determine who gets treatment. Deciding who gets what and when involves rationing, either by price or by waiting or some combination of the two. If the Mets announced that World Series tickets were free to anyone lining up in front of the Shea Stadium box office, you’d have to go get in line now. Medicare, which isn’t an unlimited benefit, is by itself projected to eat up a third of federal tax revenues by 2030. There isn’t enough money in the U.S. to pay for free, wait-free top-quality universal health care. The law of supply and demand can no more be repealed than the law that all documentary films must be left-wing. Gratzer's book suggests a real-world solution: decentralization that gives patients more choice: "both failed options [HMOs and Medicare/Medicaid] share one fatal feature. They remove choices from patients and give them to government or corporate bureaucrats. Restricting patient choices in this way, flouting the laws of basic economics, has been a mistake. It's the reason why, while pocket calculators have declined in price from $500 to $5, the price of pacemakers keeps rising." About that pacemaker - my father has one; in fact, he's on his second. The health care we provide for our geezers out here in Nevada (based on Medicare, but made much better via tax dollars paid by Nevadans...but still a pretty lousy system) paid for most of it, but I was still flabbergasted at the cost of the actual device. It was something like 8 or 10 thousand dollars. As dad is getting on in years, I asked the doctor what would happen to the pacemaker should dad, well, die...he told me it would be buried with dad, as it couldn't be re-used in someone else...not even taken out and donated to some third world country where just about any medical help would be greatly appreciated. This is the sort of health care system we get when we allow bureaucrats and lawyers - rather than doctors and patients - to rule the roost. I do wish that everyone would get it into their heads that there is a price to be paid for everything. If we could just accomplish that task, a great improvement would be worked in the world.blogsforbush.com blogs.nypost.com